You need to relook at your parti, its not as good as it could be, start again from first principles. Yes its surprising the contrast between curves and the square form but its not a jack in the box. where in nature can you find such a contrast between lines and soft voluptuous curves? Also your hierarchy needs to be rethought. Using the section is a good first attempt, but i think you need to use another just to test another idea. Try doing the hierarchy diagram using the internal view looking up to the sky (top right hand corner photograph). Avoid repeating techniques, yes your looking at 2d views plans, sections, elevations, but you need to learn to extract diagrams, shapes, parti's using 3d and perspective views to be a really clear communicator. Plus you will develop strong graphic skills. Look at the diagrams/drawings in "Architecture of the future" by Richard Rogers. Well done otherwise! ;-)
You need to relook at your parti, its not as good as it could be, start again from first principles. Yes its surprising the contrast between curves and the square form but its not a jack in the box. where in nature can you find such a contrast between lines and soft voluptuous curves? Also your hierarchy needs to be rethought. Using the section is a good first attempt, but i think you need to use another just to test another idea. Try doing the hierarchy diagram using the internal view looking up to the sky (top right hand corner photograph). Avoid repeating techniques, yes your looking at 2d views plans, sections, elevations, but you need to learn to extract diagrams, shapes, parti's using 3d and perspective views to be a really clear communicator. Plus you will develop strong graphic skills. Look at the diagrams/drawings in "Architecture of the future" by Richard Rogers. Well done otherwise! ;-)
ReplyDelete